Vital Football

Latest Liverpool FC News

Liverpool: Suarez Gets 10 Match Ban

Liverpool: Suarez Gets 10 Match Ban

The Independent Disciplinary Commission has handed Reds forward Luis Suarez a lengthy ten game suspension over the infamous biting incident...

Following Tuesday's acceptance of a violent conduct charge from the Football Association (FA), Liverpool's top scorer Luis Suarez has been provisionally banned for ten matches.

The decision, in relation to Suarez biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic, was made on Wednesday afternoon by the Independent Disciplinary Commission tasked with investigating incidents missed by match officials.

A subsequent statement confirming the news, released by the FA, read: "A three-person independent regulatory commission today upheld the FA's claim that a suspension of three matches was clearly insufficient and the player will serve a further seven first-team matches in addition to the standard three. The suspension begins with immediate effect.

"The Liverpool forward had accepted a charge of violent conduct but had denied the FA's claim that the standard three-match sanction was insufficient for the offence.

"The incident was not seen by the match officials and has therefore been retrospectively reviewed.

"Suarez has until midday on Friday 26 April to appeal [against] the additional suspension, above the standard three matches."

Given the Uruguayan has already questioned the FA's stance with regards the standard three match punishment being deemed insufficient in this case, there is a fair chance of him doing so.

Reds managing director Ian Ayre reacted to the decision by saying: "Both the club and player are shocked and disappointed at the severity of today's independent regulatory commission decision.

"We await the written reasons tomorrow before making any further comment."

The ban, as it stands, will see Suarez miss Liverpool's remaining four Premier League fixtures this season, against Newcastle United, Everton, Fulham and Queens Park Rangers, plus the first six competitive games of the 2013-14 campaign.

If the 26-year-old does decide to challenge the punishment he will remain available for selection until an appeal hearing can be heard.

Suarez is no stranger to lengthy absences from the game after serving an eight match ban for racially abusing Manchester United's Patrice Evra in October 2011.

Since joining Liverpool in January of the same year, and despite not receiving a red card at any point, Suarez has now been banned for a total of 20 games.

In addition to the two lengthy suspensions, the tally also includes one match for unsavoury hand gestures towards Fulham fans in December 2011 and one for reaching five yellow cards before the end of December this season.

Before moving to England, the former Ajax striker also missed seven matches for a similar biting incident involving PSV's Otman Bakkal.

Vital Verdict
As we feared Suarez has been severely reprimanded for his latest moment of madness. The news is of course a massive blow to both the club and player and it will be interesting to see if there is an appeal lodged. The initial reaction suggests there might be but similar protestations at the eight match racism ban did not lead to a challenge. We predicted the ban would be around the 10 game mark, based largely on the cumulative effect of his previous misdemeanours, so therefore the severity is hardly a surprise. However, was it really a more serious incident than racist abuse or a tackle that breaks an opponent's leg and risks ending their career? He will be sadly missed and only time will tell what impact it will have on Liverpool's hopes for next season and Suarez's future in general.

Top 5 Longest FA Bans
9 months - Eric Cantona for kicking a supporter in 1995
9 months - Mark Bosnich for positive cocaine test in 2003
8 months - Rio Ferdinand for missing a drugs test in 2003
12 games - Joey Barton for two counts of violent conduct during the same game (vs Manchester City) in 2012
11 games - Paolo Di Canio for pushing referee Paul Alcock in 1998

Related To This Story
Rodgers And Reina Criticise Suarez Ban
Suarez Begrudgingly Accepts Bite Charge
FA Charge Suarez Over Bite
Suarez Issues Biting Apology
Suarez Bite Latest In Videos
Suarez In Biting Incident
Vital Report: Liverpool 2-2 Chelsea

The Incident




Is ten matches the correct length of ban? Let us know your thoughts below or vote in our poll on the right-hand side of the page...



Follow me on Twitter @superbag

Not a Vital Liverpool member? It's a 100% free to join and get involved. Plus it only takes a few moments to sign up. Click here to become a member now!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Gavin Kelley-Day
Date:Wednesday April 24 2013
Time: 3:57PM

Comments

0
Don't really see how the club and player can be shocked at the ban, a second offence cannot have a shorter ban than the one imposed for the first time offence, Come on Mr Ayre do not let this become a PR disaster like the Evra racism case.
ten men
24/04/2013 16:57:00
0
I personally thought the ban is too much and an over-reaction by the FA. Yes, it shouldn't be less than the previous ban but maybe the previous ban of 7 matches for a first nibble is way over the top. I would have given him a 4 match ban for the first one and probably no more than 6 for the second. What did Keane get for the 'tackle' on Alfinga Haarland tackle back in the day ? Definitely wasn't more than 8 games and might have been less and it ended a player's career. I'd rather somebody gave my forearm a nibble than spit at me or clatter me from behind and yet those sorts of offences just get yellow cards or retrospective 2 game bans. Something wrong and maybe the FA is reacting to recent criticisms of their inaction and failure to act retrospectively by having a go at the new whipping boy now that Balotelli has gone.
CITYBOY1000
24/04/2013 19:56:00
0
Although I'm obviously not happy it is exactly what was expected all things considered. The FA had to be seen to clamp down on Suarez as a repeat offender. Also the fact that he had served seven games for a similar incident previously meant that the FA couldn't really give him anything less this time around. It would be a surprise to see the club appeal.
The Bagman
24/04/2013 21:51:00
0
The club, who have until Friday at 12:00 BST to appeal, said they were "shocked and disappointed" at the length of the suspension. typical response from Liverpool FC, what a shame, the club couldn't take the same stance has there fans have and take the punishment without a saying word.
eltoro
24/04/2013 22:30:00
0
CITYBOY1000, Mr talks *********.
eltoro
24/04/2013 22:32:00
0
Ridiculously political decision. The FA is SO afraid of any taint of leniency towards someone (WRONGLY) perceived as racist, they will use the most oblique excuse to mete out disproportionate punishment, as if to bolster their reputation when it comes to such a sensitive subject. I don't care what anyone says, but Suarez is still being vilified for the Evra case, where he was quite rightly indignant about his treatment, when it was obvious to everyone, apart from the FA and various rent-a-mob smear merchants, that he is not a racist, and yet he is charged and convicted by a kangaroo court, and when he pleads his innocence, is then told he is making matters worse. Any footballer in future who suffers this accusation should stand his ground, and demand justice, otherwise it will be held against you in perpituity.
lordjohnny
25/04/2013 00:15:00
0
Ridiculously political decision!!!!!!! he bit another player! do you understand that Johnny, or are you so *****in blinded by your own agenda, I'd of banned him for 6months.
eltoro
25/04/2013 12:25:00
0
Whatever the right & wrongs of this ban, Suarez has 2 choices. He either mans up, improves his behaviour on the pitch & shoves the negativity of his detractors down their throats or he bogs off out of England leaving himself wide open to accusations of cowardice & childishness.

Personally, I'd like to see him shove it up his detractors. Even though I can't stand the guy, only because he plays for a club that has historically crapped all over mine, I'd still rather he stayed in the Prem.

Spuds-U-Like
25/04/2013 14:03:00
0
Brilliant player but a complete basket case, the ban is about right, most LFC fans I've spoken to were expecting 10 to 12 games, so nobody should be that surprised, this has nothing to do with racism it's to do with biting an opponent (I agree using the feet can inflict much more serious injury and maybe there's a need to look further at the length of bans to potential and actual career ending injuries) not for the first time, it's a repellant behaviour and should be made an example of which it has. I would be wary if I was mr Suarez, as someone who is blessed with pace amongst his attributes, a serious leg injury would rob him of that asset making him a less extraordinary player, biting central defenders is a good way to go about aquiring such an injury
Lokesi
25/04/2013 15:57:00
0
eltoro-I'll keep this brief, as your attention span is probably limited, like your grammar. He was given a disproportionately stiff ban because of his racism case. Biting does not justify 10 games. Your assertion that he should have got 6 months is ludicrous and typical unthinking hang 'em and flog 'em hysteria.
lordjohnny
25/04/2013 19:47:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Liverpool Articles

Liverpool: Dominant Reds Hand Sunderland A Point

Reds taught a harsh lesson about staying switched on until the final whistle as they lose a 2-0 lead against Sunderland at Anfield

Stats: Liverpool v Sunderland

All the stats from Liverpool (2) vs (2) Sunderland, Anfield, 05/02/2016, 3.00pm GMT Att: 44,179

Liverpool: Team News 15/16 - Sunderland (Home)

The line-ups are in ahead of today's Premier League fixture between Liverpool and Sunderland at Anfield

Liverpool: Injury Table 15/16 - Sunderland (Home)

Our weekly update looking at Liverpool's current injuries and those of all the other top flight clubs

Archived Vital Liverpool Articles

Vital Liverpool articles from

Site Journalists

Gavin Kelley-Day
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Who Was MOTM vs. Sunderland (Home)?
Suggested By: Editor
Simon Mignolet9%
Nathaniel Clyne0%
Dejan Lovren0%
Mamadou Sakho0%
Alberto Moreno0%
Joe Allen0%
Emre Can0%
Jordan Henderson0%
James Milner0%
Adam Lallana0%
Roberto Firmino83%
Kolo Toure (sub)8%
Jordan Ibe (sub)0%
Lucas Leiva (sub)0%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Leicester City 25 15 8 2 53 20
2 Spurs 25 13 9 3 48 26
3 Arsenal 25 14 6 5 48 17
4 Man City 25 14 5 6 47 21
5 Man Utd 25 11 8 6 41 10
6 West Ham 25 10 9 6 39 9
7 Southampton 25 10 7 8 37 9
8 Everton 25 8 11 6 35 12
9 Liverpool 25 9 8 8 35 -4
10 Watford 25 9 6 10 33 0
11 Stoke 25 9 6 10 33 -7
12 Crystal Palace 25 9 5 11 32 -4
13 Chelsea 25 7 9 9 30 -2
14 WBA 25 7 8 10 29 -9
15 AFC Bournemouth 25 7 7 11 28 -12
16 Swansea 25 6 9 10 27 -9
17 Newcastle 25 6 6 13 24 -18
18 Norwich 25 6 5 14 23 -20
19 Sunderland 25 5 5 15 20 -19
20 Aston Villa 25 3 7 15 16 -20
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Liverpool Fixtures (view all)

Feb 14 2016 2:05PM : Aston Villa (a)
Barclays Premier League
Feb 28 2016 12:00PM : Everton (H)
Barclays Premier League
Feb 28 2016 4:30PM : Manchester City (H)
Capital One Cup
Mar 2 2016 8:00PM : Manchester City (H)
Barclays Premier League
Mar 6 2016 1:30PM : Crystal Palace (a)
Barclays Premier League
Mar 13 2016 4:00PM : Chelsea (H)
Barclays Premier League

Recent Liverpool Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.The Bagman6
2.BigRed833
3.Pritam S. Gill1